Tug of War: the World Bank’s New Governance and Anticorruption Efforts
نویسنده
چکیده
The recent governance and anticorruption initiative of the World Bank1 (the Bank) has come under intense fire from developing nations and some corners of Europe. There is little disagreement that corruption and poor governance in developing nations represent substantial impediments to sustainable growth. The issue is whether the Bank’s continuing efforts to root out corruption and promote good governance encroach upon political matters forbidden by the Bank’s charter.2 Consideration of this issue results in criticism from three camps. Some critics raise the charge of “mission creep”— that the Bank’s good governance efforts are an attempt to act beyond its mandate. Others contend that in fact, the Bank’s new initiative will fail because the Bank does not adequately promote human rights and democratic governance. Finally, some critics charge that, irrespective of the Bank’s mandate, its promotion of laissez-faire economic polices is the wrong prescription for the developing world because these policies fail to address weak institutions or establish rule of law.
منابع مشابه
Governance empirics: new findings and challenges
During the past decade good governance has become central to the World Bank’s mission of poverty alleviation, as a result of mounting evidence of the links between good governance and growth. Partnering with the rest of the World Bank Group, with outside organizations, and with the many stakeholders within client countries, WBI has developed an integrated approach to capacity development, gover...
متن کاملSanjay Pradhan , The World Bank Group The Relevance of Political Science to the World Bank
By the mid 1990s, scholars, practitioners, and policy makers alike had begun to recognize the critical importance of good governance for growth and poverty reduction. Yet corruption, its mirror image, remained “taboo” at the World Bank up until the historic “cancer of corruption” speech in 1996 of then-Bank President James Wolfensohn that formally brought governance and anticorruption into the ...
متن کاملIs There an Anticorruption Agenda in Utilities?
In a networked utility setting (few, predominantly monopoly providers), it is very hard to measure the extent of grand corruption using perceptions or surveys. It is even harder to measure the extent of damage done specifically by corruption, petty or grand. As a result, it will be hard to develop 'actionable indicators' of, or to develop empirically tested responses to, corruption in utilities...
متن کاملA NOVEL META-HEURISTIC ALGORITHM: TUG OF WAR OPTIMIZATION
This paper presents a novel population-based meta-heuristic algorithm inspired by the game of tug of war. Utilizing a sport metaphor the algorithm, denoted as Tug of War Optimization (TWO), considers each candidate solution as a team participating in a series of rope pulling competitions. The teams exert pulling forces on each other...
متن کاملCauses and Consequences of Firms' Self-Reported Anticorruption Efforts
We use Transparency International’s ratings of self-reported anticorruption efforts for 480 corporations to examine factors underlying firms’ efforts and their consequences. We find that firms with high anticorruption efforts are domiciled in countries with low corruption ratings and strong anticorruption enforcement, operate in high corruption risk industries, have recently faced a corruption ...
متن کامل